Comments on: The Scimpi Framework http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/ Ideas and experiences relating to the Naked Objects framework Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:33:58 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: admin http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-3946 admin Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:57:46 +0000 http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/#comment-3946 Although not much is being done on Scimpi itself, it is being kept up to date with the developments on Naked Objects version 4, ready for future developments when time permits. As always any help in developing Scimpi is most welcome, and being a fairly small code base it will be fairly easy to get stuck in. Although not much is being done on Scimpi itself, it is being kept up to date with the developments on Naked Objects version 4, ready for future developments when time permits.

As always any help in developing Scimpi is most welcome, and being a fairly small code base it will be fairly easy to get stuck in.

]]> By: Richard Pawson http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-3934 Richard Pawson Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:46:48 +0000 http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/#comment-3934 Scimpi is not currently active, but it is based on Naked Objects, which is very much active. The latter is working towards release of version 4 (on the Java platform, that is - there is also a .NET version now). It is our intention to return to Scimpi, once version 4 of Naked Objects is out of the way - and also to create something equivalent to Scimpi running on Naked Objects for .NET (it can’t be identical because ASP.NET works somewhat differently). Richard Scimpi is not currently active, but it is based on Naked Objects, which is very much active. The latter is working towards release of version 4 (on the Java platform, that is – there is also a .NET version now). It is our intention to return to Scimpi, once version 4 of Naked Objects is out of the way – and also to create something equivalent to Scimpi running on Naked Objects for .NET (it can’t be identical because ASP.NET works somewhat differently).

Richard

]]> By: Anonymous Coward http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-3933 Anonymous Coward Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:08:01 +0000 http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/#comment-3933 Is scimpi dead? Is scimpi dead?

]]> By: rmatthews http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-794 rmatthews Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:35:58 +0000 http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/#comment-794 The is no one viewer for Naked Objects, but a variety where each has its own strengths and weaknesses. The DND (or Desktop) and HTML viewers are both provided with the framework while the others are available separately. The DND provides a MDI style interface with each object showing everything, yet taking up the least amount of space. The HTML viewer shows one object per page and hyperlinks them together. The RCP viewer provides an Eclipse style UI to Naked Objects with a tabbed pane view of the objects, so only one is visible at a time. Scimpi differs from the rest because it allows the developer to define how the UI looks and interacts, whereas all the other viewers provide unhindered access to the objects and their behaviours (as long as the underlying model and security allows it). The is no one viewer for Naked Objects, but a variety where each has its own strengths and weaknesses. The DND (or Desktop) and HTML viewers are both provided with the framework while the others are available separately.

The DND provides a MDI style interface with each object showing everything, yet taking up the least amount of space. The HTML viewer shows one object per page and hyperlinks them together. The RCP viewer provides an Eclipse style UI to Naked Objects with a tabbed pane view of the objects, so only one is visible at a time.

Scimpi differs from the rest because it allows the developer to define how the UI looks and interacts, whereas all the other viewers provide unhindered access to the objects and their behaviours (as long as the underlying model and security allows it).

]]> By: Darth Ratze http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-778 Darth Ratze Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:03:11 +0000 http://blog.nakedobjects.org/2008/05/08/the-scimpi-framework/#comment-778 This looks like an amazing improvement over the NOF3.0.1 HTML viewer, but, scimpi is meant to replace the aforementioned viewer? and in the same vein... the eclipse RCP version of naked objects is going to supercede the classic NOF DND handdrawn viewer? thanks This looks like an amazing improvement over the NOF3.0.1 HTML viewer, but, scimpi is meant to replace the aforementioned viewer? and in the same vein… the eclipse RCP version of naked objects is going to supercede the classic NOF DND handdrawn viewer?

thanks

]]>